Compilation of the proposed axes of the cyber strategic document of the Islamic Republic of Iran by comparative study method
Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 PhD student at Supreme National Defense University
2 Assistant professor and faculty member of the Supreme National Defense University
Abstract
The role of strategic plans in the development of countries is obvious. Study of strategic documents prepared specifically, codified cases in the field of cyber; A way to identify ways and thoughts is based on priorities and strategies that reflect the comprehensive thoughts and plans of other societies. The use of cyber experiences of other countries in the production of strategic documents, with an emphasis on countries that are known as owners of technology and power, plays an important role in the production of comprehensive strategic barriers. In this article, considering the importance of compiling the important axes of the cyber strategic document of the Islamic Republic of Iran, while reviewing the upstream cyber documents prepared in the country, the national cyber strategic document of the USA; White House Statement 2018, Strategic Document on Cyber Security of the China; Announcement by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 2017 and the EU National Cyber Security Strategy Document; The 2012 Communication, as the last EU document in this field, has been reviewed by comparative study method. In this regard, the axes of comparative study have been extracted and after expert approval, necessary measures have been taken to determine the important axes of the country's comprehensive national cyber strategic document. As a result, eight axes were determined as the minimum axes for the country's strategic document as the lessons learned in this field as the initial guidelines.
Keywords
فهرست منابع و مآخذ
الف- منابع فارسی
- افق 1404 (1382)، چشم‌انداز بیست‌ساله جمهوری اسلامی ایران در افق 1404، تهران.
- قراملکی، ا، فرامرز (1395)، روششناسی مطالعات دینی (تحریری نو)، مشهد: دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی.
- معین‌پور، ح (1389)، جنگهای سایبری: الگوی نوین دانش جنگاوری در هزاره سوم، فصلنامه سیاسی نظامی اقتدار، 57-85.
- میرطاهر، س (1397)، رویکرد تهاجمی استراتژی ملی سایبری آمریکا. Retrieved from خبرگزاری صدا و سیما: http://www.iribnews.ir/fa/news/2237732
ب- منابع لاتین
- Min, K.-S., Chai, S.-W., & Han, M. (2015). An International Comparative Study on Cyber Security Strategy. International Journal of Security and Its Applications, 13-20.
- (2019). Retrieved from Internet World Stats, Usage Population Statics: https://www.internetworldstats.com
- Inkster, N. (2010). China in Cyberspace. Global Politics and Strategy, 12.
- Lamb, Robert, Boyden. (1984). Competitive strategic management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
- Li, Y. (2010). Cyberspace security and international coorporation in china.
- Rajiv Nag Donald C. Hambrick Ming‐Jer Chen. (2007). What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, Volume 28, Issue 9, pp. 935-955.
- Raud, M. (2016). Cyber Security in China (Attitudes, Strategies, Organizations).
- Richard A. Clarke, R. K. (April 2, 2010). cyber war the next threat to national security and what to do about it.
- Shafqat, N., & Masood, A. (2016). Comparative Analysis of Various National Cyber Security Strategies. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security (IJCSIS), 129-136.
- Shaohui, T. (2017, 03 01). XINGUA NET. Retrieved from http://www.xinhuanet.com//english/china/2017-03/01/c_136094371.htm
- Štitilis, D., Pakutinskas, P., & Malinauskaitė, I. (2017). EU and NATO cybersecurity strategies and national cyber security strategies: a comparative analysis. Security Journal, 1151–1168.
- Travis, Sharp. & M Kristin, Lord. (2011). America's Cyber future Security and prosperity in the Information Age. Center for a New American Security, volume 1.
- White House, u. s. (September 2018). NATIONAL CYBER STRATEGY of the United States of America. washington DC: White House.
)